How Changes of Statutes of Limitation in Missouri and Kansas Could Affect Victims and Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

May 2, 2022 | Sexual Abuse

All claims or lawsuits have time limits, or deadlines, for when they can be filed called statutes of limitation. In most cases, the time frame begins when the injury occurred. But for events that happen over time and those that involve minor children, like sexual abuse, calculation of the time frame can be challenging, and existing statutes of limitation can be prohibitive.

Many child victims, who are now adults, miss their legal window to bring criminal charges or file a civil claim against their perpetrator and/or other responsible individual or organizations. One of the dominant factors playing into this lost opportunity stems from a person’s natural mental and emotional response to trauma, commonly referred to as repressed memory. Essentially, the brain squashes the memory to reduce or eliminate re-traumatization to the victim. When this occurs, the abuse is forgotten, which results no reporting at all, or delayed reporting when they are older. Victims and survivors often have an experience that triggers an event, bringing back memories of the abuse they endured. When this happens, victims and survivors frequently require counseling or therapy to explore the extent of the repressed memories and learn how to cope with the re-traumatization. To give victims a fair opportunity to seek justice, statutes of limitation reform is critical and organizations like ChildUSA and Metropolitan Organization to Counter Sexual Assault (MOCSA) are leading the charge.

Currently, in Missouri the civil statute of limitation for childhood sexual abuse is age 31 for claims against the perpetrator, but age 26 for claims against non-perpetrator defendants. In Kansas, claims arising from childhood sexual abuse must be brought before the victim turns 21. However, there are a few bills being presented on both sides of the state line that could significantly alter the statutes of limitation for victims, both good and bad.

Proposed Civil Statutes of Limitation Legislation in Missouri

There are two main bills that were filed during the 2022 session that could impact civil cases in Missouri.

  • SB 1084: If passed, the civil statute of limitation would be extended five years to age 31 for child sexual abuse claims against non-perpetrator defendants.
  • SB 631: If passed, victims would have LESS time to bring civil claims. This bill seeks to shorten the time limits for claims against non-perpetrator defendants, from age 26 to age 23.

Proposed Civil SOL Legislation in Kansas

In Kansas, there were three bills filed this session that could impact civil cases.

  • SB 420 and HB 2603: If passed, these bills would eliminate the civil statute of limitation and open a permanent revival window for expired claims occurring on or after July 1, 1984, for child sex abuse victims and survivors.
  • SB 271: If passed, this bill would eliminate the civil statute of limitation and open a permanent revival window for claims that were not expired prior to 1992.

What’s Next

With the adjournment of the Missouri legislative session on May 30, 2022, it is unlikely that these bills make it to the governor’s desk in 2022. However, lobbying teams from MATA, Child USA and MOCSA continue to monitor each bill and advocate for favorable reform for victims and survivors in both Missouri and Kansas.

Several states have passed legislation similar to what has been proposed in Kansas, either extending or eliminating their statutes of limitation for civil claims arising out of child sexual abuse. Missouri’s current statute of limitations, age 26 for third party claims, often does not allow victims enough time to come forward with their story, eliminating their right to pursue justice.  SB 631, legislation proposed in Missouri, would shorten the time limits for these claims, making it more difficult for victims and survivors to have their voices heard.

Learn more about the latest in statutes of limitation reform and the important work Child USA is doing to drive change.

Reed Martens

Position: Shareholder

Office: Kansas City

Reed Martens is a skilled trial attorney and relentless advocate for victims of sexual abuse and personal injury. His ability to secure favorable verdicts and settlements has made him a trusted name in the courtroom, where he has successfully tried cases as both lead and co-counsel.

*This blog post is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney–client relationship. While Monsees & Mayer strives to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, laws and legal interpretations are subject to change. Content on this site may not always reflect the most current legal developments. For advice regarding your specific situation, please contact Monsees & Mayer directly.

Our Proven Results

Witness Statements As Critical Evidence

Witness statements provide crucial evidence to support claims of sexual abuse. They help establish a timeline of events, reveal details about the abuse, and identify potential suspects. However, witness testimony must be carefully evaluated for accuracy and reliability.

Interviewing witnesses promptly after the alleged abuse is reported maximizes the chance of obtaining an accurate statement. As time passes, memories can fade or become distorted. Witnesses should be interviewed separately to avoid influencing each other’s recollections.

Look for witnesses who were present around the time of the alleged abuse and may have observed interactions between the victim and suspect or noticed signs of distress. Teachers, caregivers, family members or neighbors are examples. Their statements can corroborate the victim’s account and provide additional details.

Evaluate witness credibility by considering factors like:
  • Their relationship to the victim and suspect. Unbiased third parties may provide more objective testimony.
  • Consistency of statements over time. Contradictions may indicate unreliability.
  • Vested interests that could motivate false testimony. Look for witnesses with no obvious agenda.
  • Their opportunity to observe relevant events. Statements from those frequently with the victim and suspect are more credible.
  • Age, mental state, sobriety and other factors that could impact perception or memory.

Compare witness statements to look for both consistencies and inconsistencies in the details. Consistencies increase reliability while inconsistencies should be explored further. Witness testimony, combined with other evidence like medical reports, can provide persuasive support for claims of abuse. However, no single piece of evidence should be viewed as definitive proof. A preponderance of consistent and collaborative evidence is needed to substantiate such serious allegations.

How Cell Phone Data Can Provide Crucial Proof

Digital evidence from cell phones should be interpreted carefully, as there are limitations. Data can be imprecise or misleading, and records may be unavailable or incomplete. However, when used properly, cell phone data provides an objective, factual record that supports or refutes claims made by involved parties. In sexual abuse claims where evidence is often scarce, cell phone data can make a critical difference. By triangulating data from multiple sources, investigators can build a compelling timeline of events to support charges and secure a conviction.

Call Detail Records

Call detail records (CDRs) provide the date, time and duration of calls and messages. CDRs are useful for establishing communication patterns between individuals, especially around the time of the alleged offense. An abrupt change in calling behavior could indicate a significant event occurred. CDRs may also reveal the locations of the cell towers accessed during a call, providing further location details.

Cell Towers

Cell phones constantly transmit data to cell towers, which creates digital records that provide location information. This data, obtained through a search warrant, can reveal where individuals were during key points in time.

Cell Site Location Information

Cell site location information (CSLI) pinpoints which cell tower was accessed by a phone at a given date and time. Although not precise, CSLI can narrow down someone’s location to a few city blocks. By analyzing records over time, investigators can track the general path a person traveled. CSLI is often used to corroborate or challenge statements made by victims, witnesses or suspects regarding their whereabouts.

Precision Location Information

More advanced technologies like precision location information (PLI) rely on GPS and Wi-Fi to identify a phone’s location within a few meters. PLI produces a nearly minute-by-minute account of where a phone has been, providing critical evidence for timelines of events. However, legal access to PLI typically requires a search warrant due to privacy concerns.

Sexual
Abuse
Booklet

Download our free educational booklet to better understand how sexual abuse claims move through the civil court system.

Other Sexual Abuse posts you may be interested in.

Troubled Teen Industry

The “Troubled Teen Industry” is an industry made up of facilities designed to reform young people’s behavior into something more desirable. They include behavior modification facilities, wilderness therapy, boot camps, “tough-love” facilities, and more. Offending...

read more

Difference Between a Civil and Criminal Sexual Abuse Case

There is a difference between a criminal and civil liability case within the justice system. Criminal liability is brought against an individual(s) by the state or federal government in order to protect society, while civil liability is all about the survivor. The attorneys at Monsees & Mayer, P.C. advocate exclusively for survivors.

Criminal Courts

The criminal courts are entirely about the criminal; in this case, the sexual abuser. Cases are handled by a prosecuting attorney, and the purpose of the proceedings is to impose fines or prison sentences upon the abuser.

While some restitution or financial compensation may be awarded to the survivor, the criminal courts are a poor avenue through which to pursue it. This is because the purpose of criminal courts is to protect society as a whole, rather than advocate for individuals’ rights.

The criminal system’s standard of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt”; in other words, an individual can only be convicted of a crime if the jury is certain the abuser is guilty. Because of this, there are many morally culpable people who escape criminal liability because of this doubt in proof.

Civil Courts

The civil justice system is all about helping sexual assault survivors. Cases are handled by civil attorneys, and the purpose is to obtain compensation for the survivors of sexual abuse. The survivor can seek compensation for the damages they incurred as a result of the sexual abuse: depression, loss of self-esteem or relationships, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), lost income and earnings capacity, medical expenses, and frequently, a lifetime of emotional distress.

The civil system’s standard of proof is relaxed compared to that of the criminal side. The survivor must prove their case by a “preponderance of the evidence.”  In simpler terms, the jury must “believe” the survivor’s case is more likely true than not; the scales must be tipped slightly in their favor. Therefore, even if an abuser escapes punishment in the criminal courts, they can still be punished within the civil court system.